selimaj-dev
5d59cc413e
Updated README.md to include detailed research on liquid-cooled small BLDC motors, focusing on internal channel cooling concepts and thermal performance expectations.
314 lines
6.9 KiB
Markdown
314 lines
6.9 KiB
Markdown
# Motor Research (Apr 24, 2026)
|
||
## Liquid-Cooled Small BLDC Motor (≈30 mm) — Research Sheet
|
||
## Focus: Internal Channel / Directed Cooling (Concept B)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 🧠 1. Objective
|
||
|
||
Design a **high power-density, continuous-duty BLDC motor (~30 mm class)** for EDF/prop aircraft using:
|
||
|
||
> **Directed internal cooling channels through the stator (not full immersion)**
|
||
|
||
Goal:
|
||
- Maximize **continuous power**
|
||
- Maintain **high efficiency at very high RPM (30k–100k)**
|
||
- Avoid fluid drag losses from rotor immersion
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# ⚙️ 2. Core Concept (B)
|
||
|
||
### Definition
|
||
A motor where:
|
||
- Coolant flows through **engineered paths inside the stator**
|
||
- Heat is removed **directly from windings and core**
|
||
- Rotor remains **dry (air-filled cavity)**
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🧩 2.1 Cooling Architecture Types
|
||
|
||
### A. Axial Channels (through stator stack)
|
||
- Holes or ducts aligned with shaft axis
|
||
- Coolant enters one end, exits the other
|
||
|
||
### B. Slot-Integrated Cooling
|
||
- Channels embedded near winding slots
|
||
- Coolant flows alongside copper
|
||
|
||
### C. Back-Iron Cooling
|
||
- Channels placed in stator back iron
|
||
- Lower impact on copper fill, but less direct
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 🔥 3. Thermal Model
|
||
|
||
### Heat Sources
|
||
- Copper losses:
|
||
\[
|
||
P_{cu} = I^2 R
|
||
\]
|
||
|
||
- Core losses:
|
||
- hysteresis
|
||
- eddy currents
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Cooling Mechanism
|
||
Convective heat transfer:
|
||
\[
|
||
Q = h \cdot A \cdot \Delta T
|
||
\]
|
||
|
||
Where:
|
||
- \( h \) = heat transfer coefficient (high for liquid)
|
||
- \( A \) = channel surface area
|
||
- \( \Delta T \) = temp difference
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📊 Expected Thermal Performance
|
||
|
||
| Coolant Temp | Winding Temp | ΔT | Notes |
|
||
|--------------|-------------|----|------|
|
||
| 30°C | 40–60°C | ~10–30°C | Moderate cooling |
|
||
| 20°C | 35–50°C | ~10–25°C | Strong |
|
||
| 10°C | 25–40°C | ~10–20°C | Very strong |
|
||
| 5°C | 20–35°C | ~10–15°C | Diminishing returns |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# ⚡ 4. Electromagnetic Tradeoffs (Critical)
|
||
|
||
## ❗ 4.1 Reduced Copper Fill
|
||
|
||
Channels take space → less copper:
|
||
|
||
- ↑ Resistance (R)
|
||
- ↑ Copper losses
|
||
- ↓ Torque per amp
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## ❗ 4.2 Reduced Iron Cross-Section
|
||
|
||
Channels remove stator material:
|
||
|
||
- ↓ Magnetic flux capacity
|
||
- ↑ Risk of saturation
|
||
- ↓ Maximum torque
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## ⚖️ Tradeoff Summary
|
||
|
||
| Parameter | Effect |
|
||
|----------|-------|
|
||
| Cooling | ↑↑ |
|
||
| Resistance | ↑ |
|
||
| Torque density | ↓ |
|
||
| Efficiency (if optimized) | ↑ overall |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 🌀 5. Fluid Design Considerations
|
||
|
||
## ✔️ Goals
|
||
- Maximize heat extraction
|
||
- Minimize pressure drop
|
||
- Ensure uniform distribution
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## ❗ Constraints
|
||
|
||
### 1. Channel Size
|
||
- Too small → high pressure drop
|
||
- Too large → weak stator + lost copper
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 2. Flow Regime
|
||
- Laminar → predictable, less transfer
|
||
- Turbulent → better cooling, higher loss
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### 3. Pressure Drop
|
||
\[
|
||
\Delta P \propto \frac{L \cdot v^2}{D}
|
||
\]
|
||
|
||
Impacts:
|
||
- pump requirements
|
||
- system efficiency
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 🧲 6. Magnetic Design Constraints
|
||
|
||
## Saturation Limit
|
||
Even with perfect cooling:
|
||
|
||
- Core saturates at high flux
|
||
- Current increase → diminishing torque
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Design Implication
|
||
You must balance:
|
||
- channel placement
|
||
- iron thickness
|
||
- slot geometry
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# ⚙️ 7. Mechanical Constraints
|
||
|
||
## 7.1 Structural Integrity
|
||
Channels weaken stator:
|
||
- risk of deformation
|
||
- vibration issues at high RPM
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 7.2 Sealing
|
||
Unlike concept A:
|
||
- sealing is localized (inlet/outlet)
|
||
- not full rotor enclosure
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 7.3 Weight
|
||
Added:
|
||
- coolant
|
||
- tubing
|
||
- pump
|
||
|
||
Must not exceed thrust gains
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 🚀 8. Performance Expectations
|
||
|
||
## Compared to Air-Cooled Motor
|
||
|
||
| Metric | Improvement |
|
||
|-------|------------|
|
||
| Continuous current | ~1.8–2.3× |
|
||
| Continuous power | ~2.5–4× |
|
||
| Efficiency | ↑ (if well designed) |
|
||
| Peak temp | ↓ significantly |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 🧠 9. Key Design Strategy
|
||
|
||
## 🔑 Optimize for:
|
||
- Minimal disruption of magnetic path
|
||
- Maximum contact with windings
|
||
- Controlled coolant flow
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## ❌ Avoid:
|
||
- Large voids in stator
|
||
- Random channel placement
|
||
- Overcomplicated routing
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 🧪 10. Recommended Cooling Fluids
|
||
|
||
| Fluid | Pros | Cons |
|
||
|------|------|------|
|
||
| Dielectric oil | Safe, good cooling | Viscosity |
|
||
| Water-glycol | Excellent heat capacity | Conductive risk |
|
||
| Fluorinated fluids | Ideal electrically | Expensive |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# ⚡ 11. System-Level Optimization
|
||
|
||
## Important Shift:
|
||
|
||
> Cooling allows higher current, but optimal design reduces current
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Best Practices:
|
||
- Lower KV motor
|
||
- Higher voltage supply
|
||
- Thicker windings
|
||
- Maximize slot fill before adding channels
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 🧩 12. Hybrid Enhancement (Best Approach)
|
||
|
||
Combine:
|
||
- Partial channel cooling (B)
|
||
- Directed oil spray (controlled A)
|
||
|
||
Avoid:
|
||
- full immersion
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 📌 13. Final Engineering Insight
|
||
|
||
> Concept B does not give “free performance”
|
||
|
||
It trades:
|
||
- electromagnetic efficiency
|
||
for
|
||
- thermal headroom
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🏁 Conclusion
|
||
|
||
For ~30 mm EDF motors:
|
||
|
||
✔ Internal channel cooling is **more viable than immersion**
|
||
✔ Enables large continuous power gains
|
||
❗ Must be carefully balanced against magnetic losses
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 🔍 14. Future Exploration
|
||
|
||
- Additive manufacturing stators
|
||
- Micro-channel cooling
|
||
- Slot liner cooling integration
|
||
- Oil jet targeting windings only
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Motor Research (Jul 20, 2025)
|
||
The research for better motor tech. We will be comparing between different kinds of motors in order to gain a better understanding of them.
|
||
### Priorities
|
||
- **Efficiency**: Current efficiency range (70/87%), goal (90-95%), efficiency is measured in output power (rpm/torque) per watt.
|
||
- **Reliability**: Withstand a long duration of high throttle and extreme conditions of weather.
|
||
|
||
## BLDC vs PMSM
|
||
| Feature | **BLDC (Brush-less DC Motor)** | **PMSM (Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor)** |
|
||
| ------------------------ | -------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- |
|
||
| **Rotor** | Permanent magnets | Permanent magnets |
|
||
| **Stator winding** | Trapezoidal | Sinusoidal |
|
||
| **Back-EMF waveform** | Trapezoidal | Sinusoidal |
|
||
| **Control** | Typically 6-step (commutation) | Field-Oriented Control (FOC) / sinusoidal |
|
||
| **Torque ripple** | Higher (due to 6-step commutation) | Lower (smooth sinusoidal control) |
|
||
| **Efficiency (general)** | Slightly lower | Slightly higher |
|
||
| **Cost and complexity** | Lower cost, simpler control | Higher cost, more complex control |
|
||
| **Applications** | Fans, RC planes, e-bikes, hobby motors | EVs, drones, industrial drives, high-end motors |
|
||
|
||
## BLDC - Brush-less DC motor
|
||
<img src="images/bldc.png" alt="BLDC motor" height=300 />
|
||
|
||
## PMSM - Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
|
||
<img src="images/pmsm.png" alt="PMSM motor" height=300 />
|